1. Please join my meeting, Mon Mar 20th 4:00 AM EDT.
https://www4.gotomeeting.com/join/852008181
2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone.
NL: +31 207 941 377
GB: +44 20 3713 5028
AT: +43 1 2060 92967
CA: +1 (647) 497-9391
US: +1 (571) 317-3129
FI: +358 972 52 2974
BE: +32 28 93 7010
ES: +34 932 20 0596
NZ: +64 9 973 7371
FR: +33 157 329 484
NO: +47 23 96 01 70
IE: +353 15 621 586
IT: +39 0 291 29 46 30
DE: +49 692 5736 7210
SE: +46 775 757 474
CH: +41 225 4599 78
DK: +45 32 72 03 82
AU: +61 2 8355 1050
1. "IEEE 1900.6 has recently initiated a new standards project, IEEE P1900.6b, on the topic of the use of spectrum sensing information to support spectrum databases. This encompasses, for example, the geolocation databases that are currently a key area of work in TV white spaces, ....”
Has one of you with an IEEE subscription looked at 1900.6 and communicated with that chair to learn more about what that working group is doing with location parameters. Also, how are these working groups dealing with specification of temporal parameters?
2. I will review in a set of slides the OpenSSRF open source EMF data model (see OpenSSRF Version 3.0 Diagrams) that Carey Beall mentioned. See this March 25 2014 Presswire article: "Wireless Innovation Forum Announces New Spectrum Standard Specification Project”. Jesse Caulfield of Key Bridge Global LLC, who participated in our last session, led this project. It would be useful to discuss this in the context of the application areas below. It appears to me to be a well structured data model that could be useful in all of these application areas.
3. We’ve discussed possible applications in:
— Cognitive radio: OpenSSRF was designed for cognitive radio. How can it be improved or made more spatially/temporally precise and/or interoperable with other systems, integratable with other data?) We talked about a 'Mt. Aetna' use case (see in the minutes of last session) in which identification and very precise temporal data about transmissions might be useful. The suggestion was that we focus on such use cases as they apply in disaster scenarios.
— Mitigating interference with Earth Observation satellite communications: Several of you have expressed interest in this topic. It would be good to go into more detail about the problem and how an EM Spectrum encoding standard might help.
— IoT device identification (and perhaps including device security and privacy): (See this Jan. 30 Lidar News article, “Eliminating Crosstalk”, which focuses on lidar crosstalk, as, for example, in vehicle navigation.)
— Orientation of semiconductor devices to indoor and outdoor spatial coordinate reference systems: per Akinori’s comment in an earlier session.
— Consistent and integrated recording, monitoring, modelling, studying and reporting of electromagnetic fields' physical effects on molecules, nanoparticles and biological structures: I would provide a presentation on this topic.
4. After discussion, we would try to make some decisions: Where do we go from here? Where’s the low-hanging fruit? From the perspectives of each of those attending, what are the clearest and most urgent requirements?
We invite anyone interested in any of these topics to participate in this session, or communicate with us on our email server, or post comments on the EM Spectrum DWG wiki. To join the EM Spectrum DWG listserv, please send email to lmckee76 at gmail dot com with your request.
(1) Review RFC comments received from the DGGS Abstract Specification Topic 21 Public Comment Period
Preliminary Agenda:
Name of Chair, Eddie Oldfield
Review and discuss public comment, decide on SWG disposition on changes.
Discussion about WPS REST API; Benjamin Pross; 52°North GmbH
Discussion about WPS 2.0 CITE Tests; Benjamin Pross; 52°North GmbH
1) Presentation from Ian Bush (Riskaware) on DSTL/Riskaware DGGS activities
2) Presentation from Perry Peterson on DGGS applications in the arctic
3) Discussion of the scope, proposed activities and organisational structure for the DGGS DWG.
4) Consideration of draft DGGS DWG Charter document
· Revision of the Testbed 12 results affecting OWS Common. Joan Maso, UAB-CREAF
· How to make progress in OWS Common 3.0 or 2.1? Joan Maso, UAB-CREAF
New dial in instructions!!!!!!!!
https://www4.gotomeeting.com/join/688060277
2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone.
NZ: +64 9 282 9510
AU: +61 2 8355 1038
IT: +39 0 230 57 81 80
NO: +47 24 05 54 97
DK: +45 32 72 03 69
AT: +43 1 2060 92964
FI: +358 972 52 2971
FR: +33 157 329 481
CH: +41 445 1124 85
ES: +34 912 71 8488
US: +1 (571) 317-3117
IE: +353 15 621 583
NL: +31 207 941 375
BE: +32 28 93 7002
CA: +1 (647) 497-9373
DE: +49 69 5880 7802 72
SE: +46 775 757 471
GB: +44 20 3713 5011
Access Code: 688-060-277 Audio PIN will be displayed upon joining the web session.
Invited guests only
Highlights of Documentation, Testing and Demonstration
update on OGC CRS registry
Agenda
* Present current draft of the IS
* General approach how the standard works...
* Authentication Code List Concept; procedure to get items on the code list and how to use it; consence on initial code list
* crafting of requirements / conformance classes
* Future work - who does what?
https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=72709
Land Admin DWG
1. Review the DWG Charter for inclusiveness (3D cadastres, developed nations) , Peter van Oosterom
2. Report from the UN GGIM EGM and the FIG/OGC/ISO event (held 14 – 18 March), Eva Unger
3. Joint OGC-World Bank White Paper on Land Administration, Peter van Oosterom
4. Implementation of digital India Land Records, M.K.Munshi
5. Harmonzation of standards- the ISO 19152:2012 LADM-family, Erik Stubkjær, Paul Scarponcini
6. Strategies for implementing LADM, Mohsen Kalantari
7. Geospatial technologies in Land Administration Systems – A survey to identify challenges and best practices? , Mohsen Kalantari/Peter van Oosterom
8. Call for membership
Point Cloud DWG
Status of the vote to make LAS 1.4 an OGC Community Standard
Stan Tillman, Hexagon Geospatial
Group discussion around a special session at the next meetings – Point Cloud Stream – what’s possible with existing products.
Stan Tillman, Hexagon Geospatial
Update on minor revision to LAS 1.4
Evon Silvia, Chair of the LAS Working Group at ASPRS
The IQmulus infrastructure for processing and visualizing large point cloud and coverage datasets
Quillon Harpham, HR Wallingford
The n-dimensional Space-Filling-Curve Library (SFClib) for managing Massive Point Clouds
Xuefeng Guan, Wuhan University
Peter van Oosterom, TU Delft
Open Point Cloud Map
Martin Kodde, Fugro, Edward Verbree and Peter van Oosterom, TU Delft
SensorThings API SWG (Tuesday 13:30-14:45)
LandInfra SWG
1. Verify membership / proxies / quorum / patent call
2. Approve agenda
3. Approve previous meeting (March 6, 2017) Draft Minutes
4. Action Items
5. Updates
LandInfra
InfraGML
DWG
bSI
6. Current Activity
InfraGML Parts 0-6: SWG vote to initiate TC vote
InfraGML Part 7 (Land Division): SWG vote to submit
LandInfra II: Site start up?
DWG: Site, WUPI, Underground
Code List manifesto
7. Other Business
LADM?
8. Next Meeting(s)
9. Adjourn
Few activities are more tied to location, geography, and the geospatial landscape than agriculture. Agricultural science, business, and policy are themselves increasingly tied to quantitative data about crops, soils, water, weather, markets, energy, and biotechnology. Matching precision agricultural machinery with precision agricultural knowledge and promoting evidence-based sustainable agricultural practices are increasingly global concerns. Access to such knowledge involves sensing, validating, integrating, and analyzing ever larger scale geospatial data streams. Sharing and interoperability of agricultural data consistent with privacy, security, and business concerns is a challenge at every scale from local farm operations to regional markets, national policy development, and global resilience projects. The participants in the Summit intend to consider the sources and roles of critical agricultural data collections, starting with soils as the common medium that connects nutrients, water, crops, weather, and arable land to agricultural sustainability. The goal of the Summit is to identify geospatial contributions and collaborations on international agricultural data standards that will be critical to successful data sharing and integration practices.
Please Register Here
1. "The issues of DescribeFeatureType() operation for WFS" and "All W*S with POST support must support mime-type application/x-www-url-form-encoding". Andreas Matheus
2. Defining JSON best practices for OGC standards work. TB 11 and TB 12 ERs as input. How to proceed with documenting Best Practice? Joan Maso
3. Defining GeoJSON best practices for OGC standards work
4. CRS and Axis order policy/guidance review and DWG approval. Carl Reed
1. Attendees / patent call
2. Approve agenda
3. Approve minutes (Orlando)
4. Review action items
5. Updates
LandInfra
InfraGML
SWG
bSI
6. Current Activity
Site proposal
WUPI (Wet, Utility, and Pipeline Infrastructure)
LandInfra Facility Parts for Drainage, Wastewater,
Water Distribution
CityGML Utility ADE
PipelineML
OGC Underground Infrastructure CDS project
Land Administration
7. Other Business
CityGML-InfraGML Integration, Kavisha Kumar, Delft
8. Next Meeting(s)
9. Adjourn
1. Report from ECMWF METOPS Workshop (Stephan Siemen or Julia Wagemann)
2. Report from ECMWF hackathon (Stephan Siemen or Julia Wagemann)
3. ECMWF datasets service (Matthew Manoussakis)
4. 15-045r5_MetOcean_Application_Profile_for_WCS2.1 update (Peter Trevelyan)
5. New topics and works (Chris Little and Marie-Francoise Voidrot)
Discussion about a public call for changes (CRP’s) to OGC CDB 1.0
Discussion about a cutoff date for CRPs to OGC CDB 1.0 for inclusion in OGC CDB 2.0
Reports from working groups:
(1) Alternative Feature Data Dictionary(ies)
(2) Metadata
(3) CityGML
(4) Geopackage
(5) More software less words
Delft TC meeting 21st March 2017.
Agenda
1. Introduction and brief description of recent activities
2. Presentations and Q&A
a. Overview of the Copernicus program, Catharina Bamps, EU
b. Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS), Cecilia Donati, Institutional Relations Manager at Mercator.
c. Satellite Derived Bathymetry , Chris Howlett, TCarta Marine
d. OGC Sensor Web Enablement Standards, Simon Jirka, 52°North Initiative
3. Work Plan summary/review and adjustment (if necessary), includes IHO MSDIWG outputs
4. Presentation of the proposal for an MSDI concept study, Scott Simmons, OGC
5. Conclusion and Summary
Report on Moving Features JSON Encoding; Kyoung-Sook Kim; AIST;
Report on Moving Features Access; Akinori Asahara; Hitachi;
Update on NetCDF Encoding; Martin Desruisseaux; GEOMATYS;
Preliminary agenda:
Agenda for the morning session (09:45 - 10:45, Room B):
11:15 |
CityGML Venue model experiment (15 mins) |
Steve Smyth, Opensiteplan |
|
11:30 |
I_City Project – Cloud based 3D geodata server (15 mins) |
Volker Coors, HFT |
|
11:45 |
LoD in CityGML |
Filip Biljecki (3D Geoinformation, TUD) |
|
11:55 |
Open Source automatic reconstruction tool for all CityGML core data (not only buildings) from 2D topography + point clouds |
Tom Commandeur, Hugo Ledoux (3D Geoinformation, TUD) |
|
12:00 |
Proposal for Transport ADE for CityGML (for traffic simulation models) |
Guus Tamminga, Faculty of Civil Engineering, TUD |
|
12:10 |
IGN pilot project GIS/BIM/CityGML |
Christophe Castaing, EGIS |
Agenda
(1) TB12 - Aviation Security ER
(Aleksandar Balaban - 20 min.)
(2) Hybrid Application of Security Methods to an Open International Publish and subscribe system
(Ian A Wilson, Boeing - 20 min.)
(3) Security and Open PI White Paper
(Andreas Matheus / George Percivall - 20 min.)
Expected motions:
(1) Testbed 12 - Aviation Security ER
- Introduction (Barois, ESA) (15min)
- EUMETSATs motivation to support new Spec (Schick,EUM) (5min)
- Reactivation: SWG "EO Product Metadata and OpenSearch" (Voges, conterra) (15 min)
- GeoJSON(-LD) encodings (Voges, conterra & Coene, Spacebel) (25min)
- Consolidation of EO Profile of O&M [OGC 10-157r4] (Voges, conterra) (5min)
- Consolidation of OpenSearch EO [OGC 13-026r8] / Feedback from CEOS Best Practice (Andrea Della Vecchia / Yves ?) (10min)
- Open Points (5 min)
13:30-14:45
13:30 |
Proposal for better support of TINS in CityGML&LandInfra and the web distribution of these |
Kavisha, TU Delft |
13:50 |
GeoBIM |
TU Delft |
14:10 |
3D content delivery - quick demo |
Carsten, OS |
14:15 |
3D content delivery and Testbed 13 - discussion |
Chairs |
14:45-16:00
14:45 |
IDBE WG – arrangements, white paper and future thinking |
Scott, Carsten, Bart |
15:00 |
Summary of LandInfra/CityGML codelist arrangements |
Steve, Paul, Carsten |
15:20 |
IoT-integration Dynamizers |
tbc |
15:40 |
|
|
Agenda for afternoon session (13:30 - 14:45, Room Q):
1. Presentation: Evaluating the Quality of Experience of the Federal Geospatial Platform Canadian Web Services; Cindy Mitchell; Natural Resources Canada (20 minutes, remotely)
2. Presentation: Initial ideas for declaring QoS information for OGC Web Services using extended capabilities; Ilkka Rinne; Spatineo (20 minutes)
3. Presentation: Development of a Data and Services Quality Model; Iain Burnell; DSTL (20 minutes)
4. Recap of the QoSE DWG work plan item discussion (10 minutes)
1) presentation of the Refereanceable Grid Coverages extension for CIS and GMLJP2 adoption E. Hirschorn KEYW
2) Annotation extension presentation based on SVG and rendering in HTML5 L. Colaiacomo Satcen
3) presentation of the ATS for GMLJP2 status L. Colaiacomo Satcen
The workshop is open to all interested participants.
Draft Programme
8:45 – 8:55 Welcome and Introduction (Athina Trakas, Michael Lutz)
8:55 – 9:25 Setting the scene: Flash presentation of position statements (all submitters of position papers)
3 min and 1 slide per presenter
9:25 – 10:15 Break-out groups – World Café (2 rounds of 30+20 min)
Each group should elaborate on 2-3 recommendations (either reinforcing the current INSPIRE approach or suggesting changes or new approaches) and concrete follow-up activities for investigating/elaborating the recommendations in more depth (workshops, experiments, consultations, …).
10:15 – 10:35 Reports to plenary (rapporteurs)
10:35 – 10:45 Wrap-up and conclusions (Athina Trakas, Michael Lutz)
Please find the submitted position papers at
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/what-if-workshop
Theme: Smart Cities and the geographic services that they need.
Presentation title; Presentation of OWS Context User Guide
Presenter(s); Roger Brackin
Presenter(s) affiliation; Envitia
Vote on User Guide Publication Recommendation
Demonstration and Discussion: OWS Context Production Client (TB12)
Presentation title; OWS Context HTML5 Encoding
Presenter(s); Joan Maso
Presenter(s) affiliation; CREAF
Vote on EP OWC-HTML5 Publication Recommendation
Presentation title; OWS Context as Capabilities Document
Presenter(s); Joan Maso
Presenter(s) affiliation; CREAF
Vote on EP OWC-GetCaps Publication Recommendation
Discussion: OWSContext.org – Work Schedule and Contributions
Chairs
Discussion: Future Work Items and Priorities for OWS Context
Chairs
- Offering Extensions: SOS, SensorThingsAPI, GeoPackage, PubSub
Meeting Agenda
- Roll Call
- Progress Report
. Amendments to IndoorGML - by Sisi Zlatanova
. Indoor Asset Management - by i-locate team
. Improvement of the core module - by Ki-Joune Li
- Presentations
. IndoorLocationGML - Chinese Standard for Indoor Location - by Li Yan
. 3D space subdivision for indoor navigation - by Abdoulay Diakite
. Identification of walkable space using a point cloud and its trajectory - by Bart Staats
- Discussion about the future direction of IndoorGML - by Giuseppe Conti
* Deploy 500 air quality sensors through citizens across Canada Dr. Steve Liang, SensorUp Inc.
* Research user feedback in spatial catalogues and realise a prototype implementation inside GeoNetwork. ELISE project. Paul van Genuchten, GeoCat
* A Stakeholder Analysis on Citizen Science Data Interoperability. Anne Bowser Wilson Center
* Land Cover and Land User Citizen Science data collected through Geo-Wiki; and the way forward within the LandSense Citizen Observatory PERGER Christoph, IIASA
* GroundTruth2.0 project. 6 case studies to interoperate with. Joan Maso, UAB-CREAF
* SWE4CS development status and way forward. Joan Maso, UAB-CREAF
* EU CS projects cluster presentations?
(6min) setup
(25min) GeoScience DWG proposal (François Robida) & discussion
(11min) GEOSS-EVOLVE (Stefano Nativi)
(11min) NextGEOSS (Bart de Lauthower)
(11min) NOAA Big Data Project (Jeff DLB)
(11min) EarthServer: Federating Big Earth Datacubes (Peter Baumann)
OGC PipelineML SWG Delft 2017 Meeting Agenda
Recommended Resources for New Participants (Jan)
Recent Developments (Jan/John)
Conceptual Model Revisions (John)
Component Attribution Definitions (Jan/John)
Linepipe
Valve
Tee
Flange
Elbow
Next Steps (Jan/John)
Completion of Attribution Definitions
Tap, Reducer, Cap, PipeConnection, Sleeve, LinepipeCoating, Meter, Casing, LauncherReceiver, Pump, Compressor, StationEquation, Assembly, Pipeline
Application Schema Generation
Schema Refinement
Interoperability Experiment
How to Participate in Initiative (Jan)
Question and Answers