%PDF-1.4
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2013-02-06T17:19:13Z
Word
2013-02-06T12:19:44-05:00
2013-02-06T12:19:44-05:00
Adobe Mac PDF Plug-in
application/pdf
Greg Buehler
Microsoft Word - 12-151.docx
uuid:0ea51ee5-e950-6d4c-b704-bdaa74a5ed61
uuid:ddc153c2-0f43-6749-9915-8c2c6163a166
endstream
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
48 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
50 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
51 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
52 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageC]/XObject<>>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
53 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
54 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
67 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/CS0 cs 0 0 0 scn
/GS0 gs
/TT0 1 Tf
0.013 Tc -0.013 Tw 10.8 0 0 10.8 90.2339 746.253 Tm
(OGC)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 2.15 0 Td
( )Tj
0.009 Tc -0.009 Tw 0.255 0 Td
(12)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw (-)Tj
0.009 Tc -0.009 Tw 1.358 0 Td
(151)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj
ET
q
86.634 45.213 125.04 35.04 re
W n
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 90.2339 47.613 Tm
(36)Tj
( )Tj
ET
Q
q
211.674 45.213 315.12 35.04 re
W n
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
0.008 Tc -0.004 Tw 9.84 0 0 9.84 328.4692 47.613 Tm
[(C)-3(opyr)2(i)4(ght)4( \251)-4( 2013 O)-4(pe)1(n G)-4(e)1(os)1(pa)1(t)3(i)3(a)1(l)4( C)-3(ons)1(or)2(t)3(i)3(um)-5(.)]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw 19.797 0 Td
( )Tj
ET
Q
q
9.354 33.987 593.292 724.026 re
W n
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 90.2339 36.573 Tm
( )Tj
ET
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 90.2339 691.773 Tm
(While it is difficult to significantly optimise the NOTAM section of the\
workflow, in )Tj
0 -1.5 TD
(reality this)Tj
( )Tj
(is not believed to cause a)Tj
( )Tj
(particularly heavy XML burden. It is the background )Tj
T*
(maps that are beli)Tj
(eved to be pre)Tj
(-)Tj
(dominant. And as these are generated from AIXM )Tj
T*
(directly, which is it)Tj
(\222)Tj
(self likely to be generated on the AIRAC cycle, it would make sense )Tj
T*
(to pre)Tj
(-)Tj
(generate the background map component on that cycle \(doing it once per \
cycle )Tj
T*
(rather than once per)Tj
( )Tj
(request which could run into 1000s of requests per day\).)Tj
( )Tj
(Of course )Tj
T*
(there is the intention to ultimately use the agility of a new aviation a\
rchitecture to shorten )Tj
T*
(the AIRAC cycle )Tj
(and ultimately )Tj
(move to an approach which doesn\222t impose a rigid )Tj
T*
(cycle)Tj
(, but in)Tj
( )Tj
(either case a \221pre)Tj
(-)Tj
(generation\222 approach would still reduce the processing )Tj
T*
(requirements as it would still only be done once per change rather than \
once per user )Tj
T*
(transaction. )Tj
( )Tj
0 -2.5 TD
(If this )Tj
(approach was taken)Tj
( )Tj
(one option would be)Tj
( )Tj
(to deploy the background maps using and )Tj
0 -1.5 TD
(integrated WMS \(much more efficient than an FPS because of the removal \
of the )Tj
32.714 0 Td
(XML )Tj
-32.714 -1.5 Td
(transfers from )Tj
(WFS )Tj
8.194 0 Td
(to WMS and the extra service interface latency\). Another approach )Tj
-8.194 -1.5 Td
(would be to build an )Tj
(optimized)Tj
( )Tj
(cache using the W)Tj
(FS/FPS architecture)Tj
( )Tj
(already created )Tj
T*
(and then deploy this with a WMS or even WMTS if the portrayal can be def\
ined a)Tj
32.88 0 Td
(-)Tj
(priori. )Tj
( )Tj
-32.88 -2.5 Td
( )Tj
0 -2.5 TD
(These options do)Tj
( )Tj
(not preclude the ability to have different representations at different \
)Tj
0 -1.5 TD
(times within the AIRAC cycle)Tj
(; )Tj
(clearly wit)Tj
(hin one cycle there are planned airspace )Tj
T*
(changes)Tj
( )Tj
(which need to be dealt with)Tj
(. )Tj
(I)Tj
(n terms of interface the WMS type interface does )Tj
T*
(support the concept of dimensions which allows the specification of )Tj
27.439 0 Td
(a )Tj
(time)Tj
( )Tj
(based request. )Tj
-27.439 -1.5 Td
(This concept would)Tj
( )Tj
(also )Tj
(be )Tj
(possible wi)Tj
(th WMTS. This does of course require all )Tj
T*
(combinations to be pre)Tj
(-)Tj
(built but given there are not that many changes within one cycle )Tj
T*
(the extra generation work is not that high.)Tj
16.718 0 Td
( )Tj
-16.718 -2.5 Td
(I)Tj
(t is clear that work needs to be done on establishing the exact performa\
nce bottle)Tj
32.656 0 Td
(necks )Tj
-32.656 -1.5 Td
(and load/potential quality of service requirements)Tj
19.855 0 Td
( )Tj
(and measuring what can be achieved as )Tj
-19.855 -1.5 Td
(has been undertaken for the main architecture in OWS)Tj
21.77 0 Td
(-)Tj
(9)Tj
(.)Tj
( )Tj
(Future work should evaluate )Tj
-21.77 -1.5 Td
(potential performance bottlenecks in more detail and identify quality of\
serv)Tj
30.491 0 Td
(ice )Tj
-30.491 -1.5 Td
(requirements for the ePIB workflow.)Tj
( )Tj
0 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
0 -2.14 TD
( )Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
58 0 obj
<>
endobj
59 0 obj
<>
endobj
69 0 obj
<>
endobj
70 0 obj
<>stream
HV{tWsso7n^W%DzD%=JЩ`UP15f<)FXbyj;o~y?u{ι;㗙EЈMIyr]KxN>1z
o&fϝ0-/Yi/):s
ɝS<{Zzޤ{pͩN\Sr2kgj?}ܚ|m>#:/!U>uJ]ScU2p_/Ԃ7jT]|P
hF\p4F4E 9W-xSZr>A(Vh6@[C$ڣ:tE7tG#{z^#f@kw88xf
ܞmW'KXϕFX@+Kơ($,&#wYevNH}Cba훔0a\QXg6SJ
^T ࢌv b*b(m9a;1? yNĘk٧TcJF,Xbg~~'!Hgݛ]c ::&c9m;,PhMMܖ9rBk=
אmҒd1DoOIi'Aҗ?rGO)x$Yz<ӱbLipdc XͳlPVԎO1"ɛhW .WjcSHdъ؎Cx.FjIi .$]h|9!wT3V#x]hVsU̱`z&''c .4H%)JޑVeM}sss^Ic1냤S.ZJsJ)(iLR V!\TJFQUL
[?:*y{ڵ6v'dOHBok
R=|@9\!nUQ1?hjLZ[$
2[elO厔IZZhOQy*ڭ_XsMG.rHd?q&.1nG[+"^rYn!bQG;H=FDIc5EVH{Y̠80ʺ͘GV͓`rN1*jH`G8':6"e볖m=)P()h˾F CcdBIFs;`-H%2@q+^\kjys/ɲ{<8 !ґhzbfksì(ŷ.I/z<'G-òH} nə̧!%x&2pӈy(?13qN7ZO/GbT.kYgOPaW!%K"ٓ;ct1D0kjBg&ҐЇSޠhGe0:{P.ֲݷ
;a:;Y f#d3!6~^ѽ[ט.:u>]ۈ6[[Z4oشIF
R߷O:ky9JNJuY䶕kw7^H-rq+!B"@bۗJKx>]U)؈0,#CjSȺWp7\]TX4'CGS236"؍˞o-;b'%L.G\nLЗ\L_ v9N'ԫ
Fdd!r2g|>inCKp!=](?W;5Uy־ؼնI-O:RS;":!!dn$)|jh#ʍ4B3xz'`DNX66S9/k! a;%C]}(Id;@Eˢ(KSD1m*<Y*~|A00d_jpbZ&YY?M5[Y2yVGˆƺfztCuXLq\v3];
}nSB6)R¨ZHʣۍ)2˚ tjRPJUf(E<vRC{6aNe9 `Mt
rE;tIXr%sܐ>9,pL(w:Qe9y1
NfV:>ߗÃ9R3X# ]jCHRd[J9rpL!UU2'!4j5@GTaKшB6d*N@!TE
o~ZK=%N0ɉ*kb5w s##lG.u]i^kEQU(jkx;o@1=FfZ_냻f
qfۯ讔\O~ۧm'_' qҨ1Q%&ׄ:pU 0FS\.vӘ[J:]ӁRhtuj$Y507TT5h7GpR^rq<|yf)˼/x|$U?TO-іC-LYnQ璅suu<;5"rf%B\f2k+V(L_GSu];