Open Geospatial Consortium |
Submission Date: <yyyy-mm-dd> |
Approval Date: <yyyy-mm-dd> |
Publication Date: <yyyy-mm-dd> |
External identifier of this OGC® document: http://www.opengis.net/doc/is/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1 |
Internal reference number of this OGC® document: 21-000 |
Version: 1.0.0-draft.1 |
Category: OGC® Implementation Specification |
Editor: Clemens Portele |
OGC API - Routes - Part 1: Core |
Copyright notice |
Copyright © 2022 Open Geospatial Consortium |
To obtain additional rights of use, visit http://www.opengeospatial.org/legal/ |
Warning |
This document is not an OGC Standard. This document is distributed for review and comment. This document is subject to change without notice and may not be referred to as an OGC Standard.
Recipients of this document are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and to provide supporting documentation.
Document type: OGC® Standard |
Document subtype: if applicable |
Document stage: Draft |
Document language: English |
License Agreement
Permission is hereby granted by the Open Geospatial Consortium, ("Licensor"), free of charge and subject to the terms set forth below, to any person obtaining a copy of this Intellectual Property and any associated documentation, to deal in the Intellectual Property without restriction (except as set forth below), including without limitation the rights to implement, use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, and/or sublicense copies of the Intellectual Property, and to permit persons to whom the Intellectual Property is furnished to do so, provided that all copyright notices on the intellectual property are retained intact and that each person to whom the Intellectual Property is furnished agrees to the terms of this Agreement.
If you modify the Intellectual Property, all copies of the modified Intellectual Property must include, in addition to the above copyright notice, a notice that the Intellectual Property includes modifications that have not been approved or adopted by LICENSOR.
THIS LICENSE IS A COPYRIGHT LICENSE ONLY, AND DOES NOT CONVEY ANY RIGHTS UNDER ANY PATENTS THAT MAY BE IN FORCE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.
THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NONINFRINGEMENT OF THIRD PARTY RIGHTS. THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR HOLDERS INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE DO NOT WARRANT THAT THE FUNCTIONS CONTAINED IN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS OR THAT THE OPERATION OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE. ANY USE OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SHALL BE MADE ENTIRELY AT THE USER’S OWN RISK. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR ANY CONTRIBUTOR OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS TO THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, OR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM ANY ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT OR ANY LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR UNDER ANY OTHER LEGAL THEORY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION, USE, COMMERCIALIZATION OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
This license is effective until terminated. You may terminate it at any time by destroying the Intellectual Property together with all copies in any form. The license will also terminate if you fail to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement. Except as provided in the following sentence, no such termination of this license shall require the termination of any third party end-user sublicense to the Intellectual Property which is in force as of the date of notice of such termination. In addition, should the Intellectual Property, or the operation of the Intellectual Property, infringe, or in LICENSOR’s sole opinion be likely to infringe, any patent, copyright, trademark or other right of a third party, you agree that LICENSOR, in its sole discretion, may terminate this license without any compensation or liability to you, your licensees or any other party. You agree upon termination of any kind to destroy or cause to be destroyed the Intellectual Property together with all copies in any form, whether held by you or by any third party.
Except as contained in this notice, the name of LICENSOR or of any other holder of a copyright in all or part of the Intellectual Property shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealings in this Intellectual Property without prior written authorization of LICENSOR or such copyright holder. LICENSOR is and shall at all times be the sole entity that may authorize you or any third party to use certification marks, trademarks or other special designations to indicate compliance with any LICENSOR standards or specifications. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The application to this Agreement of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods is hereby expressly excluded. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed unenforceable, void or invalid, such provision shall be modified so as to make it valid and enforceable, and as so modified the entire Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. No decision, action or inaction by LICENSOR shall be construed to be a waiver of any rights or remedies available to it.
- 1. Scope
- 2. Conformance
- 3. References
- 4. Terms and Definitions
- 5. Conventions
- 6. Requirements for Web-based Routing
- 7. Routing API
- 7.1. Overview
- 7.2. Requirements Class "Core"
- 7.3. Requirements Class "Manage routes"
- 7.4. Requirements Class "Intermediate waypoints"
- 7.5. Requirements Class "Modes"
- 7.6. Requirements Class "Height restrictions"
- 7.7. Requirements Class "Weight restrictions"
- 7.8. Requirements Class "Obstacles"
- 7.9. Requirements Class "Temporal constraints"
- 8. Media Types
- 9. Security considerations
- Annex A: Abstract Test Suite (Normative)
- A.1. Conformance Class "Core"
- A.2. Conformance Class "Intermediate waypoints"
- A.3. Conformance Class "Modes"
- A.4. Conformance Class "Height restrictions"
- A.5. Conformance Class "Weight restrictions"
- A.6. Conformance Class "Obstacles"
- A.7. Conformance Class "Temporal constraints"
- A.8. Conformance Class "Manage routes"
- Annex B: Revision History
- Annex C: Bibliography
i. Abstract
OGC API standards define modular API building blocks to spatially enable Web APIs in a consistent way. The OpenAPI specification is used to define the API building blocks.
The OGC API family of standards is organized by resource type.
The OGC API - Routes - Part 1: Core standard specifies the fundamental API building blocks for interacting with the "route" resources. Routing is one of the most widely used geospatial operations in the world today.
This standard uses the Route Exchange Model to represent routes.
For providers of routes, the API building blocks and the Route Exchange Model provide a simple model to publish and offer those routes as resources for use by other systems.
For developers building infrastructures, the API building blocks provide a thin abstraction layer to leverage existing routing engines and algorithms using modern APIs - saving development and deployment time and costs.
For users, applications, and enterprises, the capability to get routes across a common API, regardless of the underlying routing data, engines, or algorithms, represents a significant step forward in geospatial interoperability.
Finally, the OGC recognizes that there are many environments for implementing open routing including on road, off road, air, sea, and many others. In addition, some communities may require specialized parameters in their Routing API.
Accordingly, any routing API will accept two waypoints, the start and end position. APIs are free to find routes within a single or across multiple environments, support additional waypoints between the start and end positions, and be extensible to support parameters required by diverse implementation communities.
ii. Keywords
The following are keywords to be used by search engines and document catalogues.
OGC, Routing, Routing API, Route Exchange Model
iii. Preface
The work on this Standard started in the OGC Open Routing Pilot. After the pilot, the work on the specification continued in the OGC Routing Standards Working Group.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. The Open Geospatial Consortium shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Recipients of this document are requested to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent claims or other intellectual property rights of which they may be aware that might be infringed by any implementation of the standard set forth in this document, and to provide supporting documentation.
iv. Submitting organizations
The following organizations submitted this Document to the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC):
-
US Army Geospatial Center (AGC)
-
Ecere Corporation
-
interactive instruments GmbH
-
Skymantics LLC
v. Submitters
All questions regarding this submission should be directed to the editor or the submitters:
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
Clemens Portele (editor) |
interactive instruments GmbH |
Jeff Harrison |
US Army Geospatial Center (AGC) |
Amy Youmans |
US Army Geospatial Center (AGC) |
Jérôme Jacovella-St-Louis |
Ecere Corporation |
Ignacio Correas |
Skymantics LLC |
1. Scope
The OGC API - Routes - Part 1: Core Standard specifies the behavior of a Web API that allows applications to request routes in a manner independent of the underlying routing data set, routing engine or algorithm.
This standard defines modular API building blocks to:
-
Compute new routes,
-
Specify additional, commonly used routing parameters in addition to the start and end point of the route,
-
Manage routes on the server.
Routes are represented as a feature collection encoded in GeoJSON according to the OGC Route Exchange Model.
In addition, the API supports building blocks that enable clients to interrogate the API and retrieve the API definition, and a list of conformance classes supported by the API.
2. Conformance
The OGC API - Routes - Part 1: Core Standard defines the following eight requirements and conformance classes:
-
Minimal routing capability:
-
Core: Routing based on start/end point.
-
-
Additional API capabilities:
-
Manage routes: Store, fetch and delete routes stored on the server.
-
-
Additional routing parameters:
-
Modes: Specify the type of transport when computing the route.
-
Intermediate waypoints: Pass through additional points along the route.
-
Height restrictions: Consider a specified vehicle height in meters against known height restrictions when computing the route.
-
Weight restrictions: Consider a specified vehicle weight in metric tons (tonnes) against known weight restrictions when computing the route.
NoteA metric ton (tonne) is equivalent to 1,000 kg, which is larger than the U.S. ton. -
Obstacles: Avoid obstacles.
-
Temporal constraints: Specify departure/arrival time.
-
Requirements for a single standardization target types are considered: Web API.
Conformance with this Standard shall be checked using all the relevant tests specified in Annex A (normative) of this document. The framework, concepts, and methodology for testing, and the criteria to be achieved to claim conformance are specified in the OGC Compliance Testing Policies and Procedures and the OGC Compliance Testing web site.
In order to conform to this OGC® Standard, a software implementation shall choose to implement:
-
Any one of the conformance classes specified in Annex A (normative).
Note
|
All implementations must implement the Core conformance class. |
Conformance class | URI |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. References
The following normative documents contain provisions that, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this document. For dated references, subsequent amendments to, or revisions of, any of these publications do not apply. For undated references, the latest edition of the normative document referred to applies.
-
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). RFC 7946: The GeoJSON Format [online]. Edited by H. Butler, M. Daly, A. Doyle, S. Gillies, S. Hagen, T. Schaub. 2016 [viewed 2020-03-16]. Available at http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7946.txt
-
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). RFC 8288: Web Linking [online]. Edited by M. Nottingham. 2017 [viewed 2020-03-16]. Available at http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc8288.txt
-
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC). OGC 19-072: OGC API - Common - Part 1: Core (DRAFT) [online]. Edited by Ch. Heazel. 2021 [viewed 2021-12-22]. Available at https://docs.ogc.org/DRAFTS/19-072.html
-
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC). OGC 21-001: OGC Route Exchange Model (DRAFT) [online]. Edited by C. Portele. 2021 [viewed 2021-12-22]. Available at https://docs.ogc.org/DRAFTS/21-001.html
4. Terms and Definitions
This document used the terms defined in OGC Policy Directive 49, which is based on the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2, Rules for the structure and drafting of International Standards. In particular, the word "shall" (not “must”) is the verb form used to indicate a requirement to be strictly followed to conform to this standard and OGC documents do not use the equivalent phrases in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
This document also uses terms defined in the OGC Standard for Modular specifications (OGC 08-131r3), also known as the 'ModSpec'. The definitions of terms such as standard, specification, requirement, and conformance test are provided in the ModSpec.
For the purposes of this document, the following additional terms and definitions apply.
- cost function
-
a function that maps an event or values of one or more variables into a real number intuitively representing some "cost" associated with the event
EXAMPLE: For routing, typical "costs" that would be incurred are duration (fastest route) or distance (shortest route).
- feature
-
abstraction of real world phenomena [ISO 19101-1:2014]
- feature collection
-
a set of features from a dataset [OGC API - Features - Part 1: Core]
- GeoJSON
-
geospatial data interchange format based on JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) [IETF RFC 7946]
- route
-
sequence of connected segments providing directions to travel between specific waypoints
Note
|
This definition does not use the definition from ISO 19134:2007 because of use of terms such as "links" and "network". |
- waypoint
-
location that plays a role in choosing candidate routes potentially satisfying a routing request [ISO 19133:2005]
- Web API
-
API using an architectural style that is founded on the technologies of the Web [OGC API - Features - Part 1: Core]
5. Conventions
5.1. Identifiers
The normative provisions in this Standard are denoted by the URI
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1
All requirements and conformance tests that appear in this document are denoted by partial URIs which are relative to this base.
Note
|
The URI is temporary during the development of this specification. The final URI in the published standard will be http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0 .
|
5.2. Link relations
To express relationships between resources, RFC 8288 (Web Linking) is used.
The following link relation types registered with IANA are used in this document:
-
describedby: Refers to a resource providing information about the link’s context.
-
item: The target IRI points to a resource that is a member of the collection represented by the context IRI.
-
self: Conveys an identifier for the link’s context.
-
service-desc: Identifies service description for the context that is primarily intended for consumption by machines.
-
service-doc: Identifies service documentation for the context that is primarily intended for human consumption.
The following link relation types registered by the OGC Naming Authority are used in this document:
-
http://www.opengis.net/def/rel/ogc/1.0/conformance: Refers to a resource that identifies the specifications that the link’s context conforms to.
-
http://www.opengis.net/def/rel/ogc/1.0/routes: Refers to a Routes resource.
Each resource representation includes an array of links. Implementations are free to add additional links for all resources provided by the API.
5.3. Use of HTTPS
For simplicity, this document in general only refers to the HTTP protocol. This is not meant to exclude the use of HTTPS and simply is a shorthand notation for "HTTP or HTTPS." In fact, most servers are expected to use HTTPS, not HTTP.
5.4. References to OpenAPI components in normative statements
This document uses OpenAPI 3.0 fragments as examples and to formally state requirements. However, using OpenAPI 3.0 is not required for implementing a server.
In this document, fragments of OpenAPI definitions are shown in YAML (YAML Ain’t Markup Language) since YAML is easier to read than JSON and is typically used in OpenAPI editors. YAML is described by its authors as a human friendly data serialization standard for all programming languages.
Some normative statements (requirements, recommendations and permissions) use a phrase that a component in the API definition of the server must be "based upon" a schema or parameter component in the OGC schema repository.
In the case above, the following changes to the pre-defined OpenAPI component are permitted.
-
The range of values of a parameter or property may be extended (additional values) or constrained (if a subset of all possible values are applicable to the server). An example for a constrained range of values is to explicitly specify the supported values of a string parameter or property using an enum.
-
The default value of a parameter may be changed or added unless a requirement explicitly prohibits this.
-
Additional properties may be added to the schema definition of a Response Object.
-
Informative text may be changed or added, like comments or description properties.
-
If the server supports an XML encoding,
xml
properties may be added to the relevant OpenAPI schema components.
For API definitions that do not conform to the OpenAPI Specification 3.0, the normative statement should be interpreted in the context of the API definition language used.
5.5. Alignment with OGC API - Processes
The computation of a route is a process that operates on geospatial data that typically includes a routing dataset, which is a networked dataset that has a set of connected vertices and edges that have topological properties on which analysis can be done. This standard specifies the OGC API building blocks for Routes as API resources. An alternate implementation option for a Routing API is to implement routing as a process using the building blocks specified in the OGC API - Processes - Part 1: Core Standard. Both building blocks have been aligned so that the same route definition can be sent to both API options. The alignment between OGC API Processes and OGC API Routes is mostly transparent to developers, except for two extensions needed for the Route Definition object that is submitted in a POST request to the Routes resource (path /routes
) that would not be necessary for the Routes API:
-
An extra "inputs" member that contains the route definition object;
-
Extra "value" members in the waypoints, obstacles and temporal constraints objects.
6. Requirements for Web-based Routing
This section describes the requirements that this standard supports.
The bare minimum requirement for a Routing API is to compute a route based on a start and end point. The resulting route is encoded using the Route Exchange Model (REM).
Besides this basic requirement, additional optional requirements to the API are:
-
Storage and management of computed routes
Additionally, a Routing API may support the following optional routing parameters:
-
Capability to add additional intermediate waypoints.
-
Select a transport mode for the route computation.
-
Apply a height restriction to the route computation.
-
Apply a weight restriction to the route computation.
-
Ability to define obstacles that have to be avoided.
-
Specify departure or arrival times.
7. Routing API
7.1. Overview
This clause specifies the API building blocks for a Web API for Routing based on the OGC Web API Guidelines, OGC API Common and the OGC Route Exchange Model. The API building blocks are specified in the following requirements/conformance classes:
-
Minimal routing capability:
-
Core: Routing based on start/end point.
-
-
Additional API capabilities:
-
Manage routes: Store, fetch and delete routes stored on the server.
-
-
Additional routing parameters:
-
Mode: Specify the type of transport when computing the route.
-
Intermediate waypoints: Pass through additional points along the route.
-
Height restrictions: Consider a specified vehicle height in meters against known height restrictions when computing the route.
-
Weight restrictions: Consider a specified vehicle weight in metric tons (tonnes) against known weight restrictions when computing the route.
-
Obstacles: Avoid obstacles.
-
Temporal constraints: Specify departure/arrival time.
-
The API building blocks support the resources and operations listed in Table 1.
Resource | Path | HTTP method | Request media type | Response media type | Document reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Landing page |
|
GET |
n/a |
|
|
Conformance declaration |
|
GET |
n/a |
|
|
Routes |
|
POST |
|
|
|
GET |
n/a |
|
|||
Route |
|
GET |
n/a |
|
|
DELETE |
n/a |
n/a |
|||
Route definition |
|
GET |
n/a |
|
The first three operations are available in the 'Core' requirements class. All routing APIs implementing this Standard will support them. The other four operations are implemented by routing APIs implementing the 'Manage routes' requirements class.
7.2. Requirements Class "Core"
Requirements Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/req/core |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Dependency |
OGC API - Common - Part 1: Core, Requirements Classes "Core", "Landing Page", "JSON" |
Indirect Dependency |
|
Indirect Dependency |
OGC Route Exchange Model, Requirements Class "Route Exchange Model" |
Indirect Dependency |
7.2.1. OGC API - Common - Part 1: Core
At the time of writing, OGC API - Common - Part 1: Core has been voted on, but is not yet published. The requirements classes "Core", "Landing Page" and "JSON" have to be supported. This includes support for the resources Landing Page, Conformance Declaration and API Definition. Support for the "HTML" and "OpenAPI 3.0" requirements classes is recommended.
Note
|
Version 1.0 of this Standard will either reference a published version of the OGC API - Common - Part 1: Standard or directly include the relevant provisions from the requirements classes "Core", "Landing Page" and "JSON". |
7.2.2. API landing page
Requirement 1 |
/req/core/landing-page-link |
A |
The content of the landing page response SHALL include a link to the Routes resource at path |
The following is an example of a landing page of a routing API that implements this Standard.
{
"links": [
{
"href": "https://example.org/api/routing/v1",
"rel": "self",
"type": "application/json",
"title": "This document"
},
{
"href": "https://example.org/api/routing/v1/api",
"rel": "service-desc",
"type": "application/vnd.oai.openapi+json;version=3.0",
"title": "The API definition in OpenAPI JSON"
},
{
"href": "https://example.org/api/routing/v1/api.html",
"rel": "service-doc",
"type": "text/html",
"title": "The API documentation in HTML"
},
{
"href": "https://example.org/api/routing/v1/conformance",
"rel": "http://www.opengis.net/def/rel/ogc/1.0/conformance",
"type": "application/json",
"title": "The list of conformance classes implemented by this API"
},
{
"href": "https://example.org/api/routing/v1/routes",
"rel": "http://www.opengis.net/def/rel/ogc/1.0/routes",
"type": "application/json",
"title": "Compute routes"
}
]
}
7.2.3. Declaration of conformance classes
The following is an example of the conformance declaration of a routing API that implements all requirements classes specified in this Standard.
Requirements classes can support options and parsing the API definition may be unnecessarily costly for clients to determine the options. The conformance declaration, therefore, is extended to support stating the options of a conformance class in a properties
member where the conformance class URI is the key for the options of that conformance class.
{
"conformsTo": [
"http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/core",
"http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/mode",
"http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/intermediate-waypoints",
"http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/height",
"http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/weight",
"http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/obstacles",
"http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/time",
"http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/manage-routes"
],
"properties": {
"http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/core": {
"preferences": [
"fastest",
"shortest"
]
},
"http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/mode": {
"modes": [
"motor-vehicle",
"bicycle",
"pedestrian"
]
}
}
}
7.2.4. Geometries
All implementations of this Standard will support geometries encoded as GeoJSON. This includes the waypoints in the route definition and the geometries of all features in the route exchange model (overview, start, end, segments).
All geometries use coordinates based on the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) datum, i.e., the coordinate reference system (CRS) used by Global Positioning System (GPS). In GeoJSON, a coordinate is an array of numbers. The first two elements are longitude and latitude, or easting and northing, precisely in that order and specified in decimal numbers. Ellipsoidal height may be included as an optional third element.
Support for additional encodings or additional CRSs may be specified in future extensions.
7.2.5. Routes
Compute a new route
This operation creates a new route. The payload of the request specifies the definition of the new route.
The core requirements class supports a minimum route definition by using two waypoints
: The start and end point of the route.
In addition, clients can select a cost function, as the routing preference
. The API declares the cost functions that it supports in the Conformance Declaration resource and in the API definition.
An optional name
for the route can be provided. The name can be used as the title in links to the route and the name is also included in the route itself.
Requirement 2 |
/req/core/compute-route-op |
A |
The server SHALL support the HTTP POST operation at the path |
B |
The server SHALL accept a route definition in the content of the request based upon the following OpenAPI 3.0 schema:
|
Additional members in the route definition can be ignored.
Note
|
The content model of the route definition object has been designed so that it can also be the content of a process execution request according to the OGC API - Processes - Part 1: Core Standard. The motivation for this is the following: The computation of a route is a process that operates on geospatial data that typically includes a routing dataset, which is a networked dataset that has a set of connected vertices and edges that have topological properties on which analysis can be done. This standard specifies the OGC API building blocks for Routes as API resources. An alternate implementation option for a routing API could be to implement routing as a Process resource using the building blocks specified in the OGC API - Processes - Part 1: Core Standard. The current design allows that the same request can be sent to both API options to compute a new route. The decision to align the payload with OGC API Processes adds additional members "inputs" and "value" that would otherwise be unnecessary. |
Requirement 3 |
/req/core/conformance-values |
A |
The content of the conformance declaration response at path
|
See Conformance declaration for an example.
Note
|
The plan is to register well-known cost functions with the OGC that are recommended for use, where applicable. Once a register has been established, this Standard will be updated. Until then, use fastest for cost functions that optimize duration and shortest for cost functions that optimize distance.
|
The property "preference" in a route definition is a client hint and the server determines how to consider the preference in the computation of the route. If no preference is specified in the route definition the first value listed in the array is considered the default cost function.
Requirement 4 |
/req/core/compute-route-success |
A |
A successful, synchronous execution of the operation SHALL be reported as a response with a HTTP status code |
B |
By default the response content SHALL conform to the requirements class "Route Exchange Model". |
Note
|
This requirements class provides no mechanism to change the default, and future extensions could return another route representation, such as an OGC GeoPackage. |
Recommendation 1 |
/rec/core/compute-route-success |
A |
If the request included an |
B |
The response SHOULD include a |
This requirements class only specifies requirements for the synchronous execution of a routing request. Requirements for the asynchronous execution can be added in a future extension to this Standard.
Requirement 5 |
/req/core/error |
A |
If the request does not conform to the requirements |
B |
If the request is valid, but the server is not able to process the request (e.g., the server has insufficient route network data for the request), a response with status code |
The following is an example request for the fastest route from Reagan National Airport to the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C.
{
"inputs": {
"name": "Reagan Airport to Capitol",
"waypoints": {
"value": {
"type": "MultiPoint",
"coordinates": [
[
-77.037722,
38.851444
],
[
-77.009003,
38.889931
]
]
}
},
"preference": "fastest"
}
}
{
"type": "FeatureCollection",
"name": "Reagan Airport to Capitol",
"features": [
{
"type": "Feature",
"id": 1,
"geometry": {
"type": "LineString",
"coordinates": [
[
-77.037722,
38.851444
],
...,
[
-77.012520,
38.889780
]
]
},
"properties": {
"featureType": "route overview",
"length_m": 8213,
"duration_s": 483
}
},
{
"type": "Feature",
"id": 2,
"geometry": {
"type": "Point",
"coordinates": [
-77.037722,
38.851444
]
},
"properties": {
"featureType": "start"
}
},
{
"type": "Feature",
"id": 3,
"geometry": {
"type": "Point",
"coordinates": [
-77.041674,
38.871088
]
},
"properties": {
"featureType": "segment",
"length_m": 3314,
"duration_s": 213,
"instruction": "turn right",
"roadName": "George Washington Memorial Pkwy",
"maxHeight": 4.5,
"speedLimit": 55,
"speedLimitUnit": "mph"
}
},
...,
{
"type": "Feature",
"id": 17,
"geometry": {
"type": "Point",
"coordinates": [
-77.012520,
38.889780
]
},
"properties": {
"featureType": "segment",
"length_m": 517,
"duration_s": 73,
"roadName": "First Street",
"speedLimit": 35,
"speedLimitUnit": "mph"
}
},
{
"type": "Feature",
"id": 18,
"geometry": {
"type": "Point",
"coordinates": [
-77.012520,
38.889780
]
},
"properties": {
"featureType": "end"
}
}
]
}
7.3. Requirements Class "Manage routes"
Requirements Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/req/manage-routes |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Dependency |
7.3.1. Routes
Requirement 6 |
/req/manage-routes/routes-success |
A |
The response to a successful execution of the operation to compute a route SHALL include a header |
In the response to a synchronous request to compute a route, the server returns the route in the payload, but also the URI of the new route such as: (https://example.org/api/routing/v1/routes/hdg6g
). The following illustrates the HTTP request sent to the API and the HTTP response returned by the API:
POST /api/routing/v1/routes HTTP/1.1
Host: example.org
Content-Type: application/json
{ ... the route definition ... }
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2021 16:42:23 GMT
Location: https://example.org/api/routing/v1/routes/hdg6g
Content-Type: application/geo+json
{ ... the route ... }
Permission 1 |
/per/manage-routes/purge-routes |
A |
Routing APIs may automatically purge routes stored on the server. |
Typically, routes will be removed after a reasonable time, for example, a few hours after the route was last accessed.
Fetch routes
This operation returns a list of routes that are currently available.
Requirement 7 |
/req/manage-routes/get-routes-op |
A |
The server SHALL support the HTTP GET operation at the path |
Requirement 8 |
/req/manage-routes/get-routes-success |
A |
A successful execution of the operation SHALL be reported as a response with a HTTP status code |
B |
The content of that response SHALL be based upon the following OpenAPI 3.0 schema:
|
C |
The links SHALL include a link (link relation |
D |
If a route has a name, the name SHALL be used in the link title. |
Access to this resource will typically require authentication. The server will only include links to routes that the client is authorized to access.
{
"links": [
{
"href": "https://example.org/api/routing/v1/routes",
"rel": "self",
"type": "application/json",
"title": "This document"
},
{
"href": "https://example.org/api/routing/v1/routes/5hsb32",
"rel": "item",
"type": "application/geo+json",
"title": "Lincoln Memorial to hotel"
},
{
"href": "https://example.org/api/routing/v1/routes/9fg3dh",
"rel": "item",
"type": "application/geo+json",
"title": "Lafayette Square to Zoo"
},
{
"href": "https://example.org/api/routing/v1/routes/j6gdg3",
"rel": "item",
"type": "application/geo+json",
"title": "DCA to hotel"
}
]
}
7.3.2. Route
Fetch a route
This operation returns the route with id routeId
. The route content is
described by the "Route Exchange Model".
Requirement 9 |
/req/manage-routes/get-route-op |
A |
The server SHALL support the HTTP GET operation at the path |
Requirement 10 |
/req/manage-routes/get-route-success |
A |
The response to the request SHALL conform to the requirement |
See The route response: for an example of a route.
Delete a route
This operation deletes a route with identifier routeId
.
If the route is still in processing, the routing process is canceled.
Requirement 11 |
/req/manage-routes/delete-route-op |
A |
The server SHALL support the HTTP DELETE operation at the path |
Requirement 12 |
/req/manage-routes/delete-route-success |
A |
A successful execution of the operation SHALL be reported as a response with a HTTP status code |
B |
If the operation is not executed immediately, but is added to a processing queue, the response SHALL have a HTTP status code |
After the execution of the request, the route will no longer be included in the Routes resource (path /routes
) and a GET request to /routes/{routeId}
will return a response with a HTTP status code 404
.
7.3.3. Route definition
Fetch the definition of a route
This operation returns the input parameters used to create the route with id routeId
.
Requirement 13 |
/req/manage-routes/route-definition-op |
A |
The server SHALL support the HTTP GET operation at the path |
Requirement 14 |
/req/manage-routes/route-definition-success |
A |
A successful execution of the operation SHALL be reported as a response with a HTTP status code |
B |
The content of that response SHALL be identical to the content of the POST request to |
7.4. Requirements Class "Intermediate waypoints"
The client can specify additional waypoints along the route between the start location and the end location to consider when computing the route.
Requirements Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/req/intermediate-waypoints |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Dependency |
Requirement 15 |
/req/intermediate-waypoints/input |
A |
The server SHALL support at least five points in the member with the
name "waypoints" in the route definition in a HTTP POST request to the
path |
Requirement 16 |
/req/intermediate-waypoints/success |
A |
The computed route SHALL pass through all waypoints in the order in which they have been provided. "Pass through" means that the route overview line string geometry passes through the position or a position on the route network that is close to the waypoint. |
7.5. Requirements Class "Modes"
Mode is a restriction based on the type of transport desired when computing the route. For instance, "On Road", "Off Road". The API declares the modes that it supports.
Requirements Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/req/mode |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Dependency |
Requirement 17 |
/req/mode/input |
A |
The server SHALL support a member at the JSON Pointer
|
The following is an example request for the fastest bicycle route from Reagan National Airport to the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C.
{
"inputs": {
"name": "Reagan Airport to Capitol",
"waypoints": {
"value": {
"type": "MultiPoint",
"coordinates": [
[
-77.037722,
38.851444
],
[
-77.009003,
38.889931
]
]
}
},
"preference": "fastest",
"mode": "cycling"
}
}
Requirement 18 |
/req/mode/conformance-values |
A |
The content of the conformance declaration response at path
|
See Conformance declaration for an example.
Note
|
The plan is to register well-known modes with the OGC Naming Authority that are recommended for use, where applicable. |
The mode is a client hint and it is the decision of the server how to consider the selected mode in the computation of the route. If no mode is specified in the route definition then the first value listed in the array is considered to be the default mode.
7.6. Requirements Class "Height restrictions"
This requirement enables the API request to consider a specified vehicle height, in meters, against known height restrictions when computing the route.
Requirements Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/req/height |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Dependency |
Requirement 19 |
/req/height/input |
A |
The server SHALL support a member at the JSON Pointer
|
The following is an example request for the fastest route with a vehicle with a height of four meters from Reagan National Airport to the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C.
{
"inputs": {
"name": "Reagan Airport to Capitol",
"waypoints": {
"value": {
"type": "MultiPoint",
"coordinates": [
[
-77.037722,
38.851444
],
[
-77.009003,
38.889931
]
]
}
},
"preference": "fastest",
"height": 4.0
}
}
Requirement 20 |
/req/height/success |
A |
The computed route SHALL be passable by vehicles with a height up to the value of "height" in meters. |
7.7. Requirements Class "Weight restrictions"
This requirement enables the API request to specify a vehicle weight in metric tons (tonnes) against known weight restrictions when computing the route.
Requirements Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/req/weight |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Dependency |
Requirement 21 |
/req/weight/input |
A |
The server SHALL support a member at the JSON Pointer
|
The following is an example request for the fastest route with a vehicle with a weight of 8.5 metric tons from Reagan National Airport to the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C.
{
"inputs": {
"name": "Reagan Airport to Capitol",
"waypoints": {
"value": {
"type": "MultiPoint",
"coordinates": [
[
-77.037722,
38.851444
],
[
-77.009003,
38.889931
]
]
}
},
"preference": "fastest",
"weight": 8.5
}
}
Requirement 22 |
/req/weight/success |
A |
The computed route SHALL be passable by vehicles with a weight up to the value of "weight" in metric tons (tonnes). |
7.8. Requirements Class "Obstacles"
This requirement enables the API request to specify one or more polygons describing areas the route should avoid.
Requirements Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/req/obstacles |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Dependency |
Requirement 23 |
/req/obstacles/input |
A |
The server SHALL support a member at the JSON Pointer
|
The following is an example request for the fastest route from Reagan National Airport to the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C, that avoids an rectangular area that includes parts of Georgetown
{
"inputs": {
"name": "Reagan Airport to Capitol",
"waypoints": {
"value": {
"type": "MultiPoint",
"coordinates": [
[
-77.037722,
38.851444
],
[
-77.009003,
38.889931
]
]
}
},
"preference": "fastest",
"obstacles": {
"value": {
"type": "MultiPolygon",
"coordinates": [
[
[
[
-77.073211,
38.9023888
],
[
-77.049522,
38.9023888
],
[
-77.049522,
38.9104038
],
[
-77.073211,
38.9104038
],
[
-77.073211,
38.9023888
]
]
]
]
}
}
}
}
Requirement 24 |
/req/obstacles/success |
A |
The computed route SHALL not pass through the polygons identified as obstacles. |
7.9. Requirements Class "Temporal constraints"
This requirement enable the API request to specify the time of departure or arrival. The default value is an immediate departure.
Requirements Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/req/time |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Dependency |
Requirement 25 |
/req/time/input |
A |
The server SHALL support a member at the JSON Pointer
|
B |
The |
The following is an example request for the fastest route from Reagan National Airport to the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C, that arrives at 6pm local time on February 24th, 2022.
{
"inputs": {
"name": "Reagan Airport to Capitol",
"waypoints": {
"value": {
"type": "MultiPoint",
"coordinates": [
[
-77.037722,
38.851444
],
[
-77.009003,
38.889931
]
]
}
},
"preference": "fastest",
"when": {
"value": {
"timestamp": "2022-02-24T13:00:00Z",
"type": "arrival"
}
}
}
}
Requirement 26 |
/req/time/success |
A |
All temporal information in the route SHALL be based on the values in the "when" member (the time of departure or arrival, the default value is an immediate departure). |
B |
The start and end of the route SHALL include the |
C |
The route overview and the segments SHALL include the |
Recommendation 2 |
/rec/time/success |
A |
The route SHOULD consider the expected traffic situation at the time specified in the "when" member. |
8. Media Types
For the media types of routes according to the Route Exchange Model, see [REM].
For all other resources, application/json
applies for JSON documents and text/html
for HTML documents.
9. Security considerations
The general Security Considerations for Web APIs are also applicable to the Routing API. For example, see the Security Considerations section in OGC API - Features - Part 1: Core.
The following is a list of topics to be considered by implementers of the OGC Routing API:
-
Fetching the list of routes (GET
/routes
) returns information about all routes on the server. In any operational, public deployment every user should probably only see their routes plus routes that others have shared with the user. -
The same applies to access to each route (GET
/route/{routeId}
) and their definition (GET/route/{routeId}/definition
) as well as to the capability to cancel or delete a route (DELETE/route/{routeId}
).
That is, any deployment that is not restricted to a closed group of users will typically require user accounts, access control to the API operations and a capability for sharing routes with the public or other users.
Annex A: Abstract Test Suite (Normative)
This test suite uses the Given-When-Then notation to specify the tests.
Given input to all tests is a Routing API with its landing page at {apiURI}
and optional authentication credentials.
A.1. Conformance Class "Core"
Conformance Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/core |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Requirements class |
|
Dependency |
|
Indirect dependency |
Note
|
The Conformance Class "JSON" in Common Core has a dependency to the Conformance Classes "Core" and "Landing Page"; that is, testing against "JSON" will automatically test against the dependencies. |
A.1.1. Conformance Test 1
Test id: |
/conf/core/landing-page-link |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that the link to the Routes resource exists |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.1.2. Conformance Test 2
Test id: |
/conf/core/preferences |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that the preference values are stated in the conformance declaration |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.1.3. Conformance Test 3
Test id: |
/conf/core/compute-route-success |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that routes can be computed |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.1.4. Conformance Test 4
Test id: |
/conf/core/compute-route-error-400 |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that invalid requests return a 400 |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.1.5. Conformance Test 5
Test id: |
/conf/core/compute-route-error-422 |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that invalid requests return a 422 |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.1.6. Conformance Test 6
Test id: |
/conf/core/compute-route-preference-success |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that routes can be computed for all preference values |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.1.7. Conformance Test 7
Test id: |
/conf/core/compute-route-preference-error-400 |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that invalid preference values return a 400 |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.2. Conformance Class "Intermediate waypoints"
Conformance Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/intermediate-waypoints |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Requirements class |
|
Dependency |
A.2.1. Conformance Test 8
Test id: |
/conf/intermediate-waypoints/compute-route-success |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that routes with intermediate waypoints can be computed |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.3. Conformance Class "Modes"
Conformance Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/mode |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Requirements class |
|
Dependency |
A.3.1. Conformance Test 9
Test id: |
/conf/mode/modes |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that the mode values are stated in the conformance declaration |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.3.2. Conformance Test 10
Test id: |
/conf/core/compute-route-mode |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that routes can be computed for all modes |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.4. Conformance Class "Height restrictions"
Conformance Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/height |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Requirements class |
|
Dependency |
A.4.1. Conformance Test 11
Test id: |
/conf/height/compute-route-success |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that routes with height restrictions can be computed |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.5. Conformance Class "Weight restrictions"
Conformance Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/weight |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Requirements class |
|
Dependency |
A.5.1. Conformance Test 12
Test id: |
/conf/weight/compute-route-success |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that routes with weight restrictions can be computed |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.6. Conformance Class "Obstacles"
Conformance Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/obstacles |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Requirements class |
|
Dependency |
A.6.1. Conformance Test 13
Test id: |
/conf/obstacles/compute-route-success |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that routes can be computed avoiding obstacles |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.7. Conformance Class "Temporal constraints"
Conformance Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/time |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Requirements class |
|
Dependency |
A.7.1. Conformance Test 14
Test id: |
/conf/time/compute-route-success-default |
---|---|
Requirements: |
/req/time/input A/B, /req/time/success A/B/C |
Test purpose: |
Check that routes with the default time constraints can be computed |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.7.2. Conformance Test 15
Test id: |
/conf/time/compute-route-success |
---|---|
Requirements: |
/req/time/input A/B, /req/time/success A/B/C |
Test purpose: |
Check that routes with time constraints can be computed |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.7.3. Conformance Test 16
Test id: |
/conf/time/compute-route-success-400-error |
---|---|
Requirements: |
/req/time/input A/B |
Test purpose: |
Check that routes with invalid time constraints are rejected |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.8. Conformance Class "Manage routes"
Conformance Class |
|
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-routes-1/1.0.0-draft.1/conf/manage-routes |
|
Target type |
Web API |
Requirements class |
|
Dependency |
A.8.1. Conformance Test 17
Test id: |
/conf/manage-routes/routes-success-1 |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that a link to the stored route is returned (part 1) |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.8.2. Conformance Test 18
Test id: |
/conf/manage-routes/routes-success-2 |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that a link to the stored route is returned (part 2) |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.8.3. Conformance Test 19
Test id: |
/conf/manage-routes/get-routes-success |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that routes can be fetched |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.8.4. Conformance Test 20
Test id: |
/conf/manage-routes/get-route-success |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that routes can be fetched |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.8.5. Conformance Test 21
Test id: |
/conf/manage-routes/get-route-definition-success |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that route definitions can be fetched |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.8.6. Conformance Test 22
Test id: |
/conf/manage-routes/delete-route-success-1 |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that a route can be deleted |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
A.8.7. Conformance Test 23
Test id: |
/conf/manage-routes/delete-route-success-2 |
---|---|
Requirements: |
|
Test purpose: |
Check that a route has been deleted |
Test method: |
Given:
When:
Then:
|
Annex B: Revision History
Date | Release | Editor | Primary clauses modified | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-01-12 |
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT |
C. Portele |
all |
initial version, based on Open Routing Pilot results |
2021-04-23 |
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT |
C. Portele |
all |
Support for RFC 7240 ("Prefer" header), OGC API - Common - Part 1: Core, editorial updates |
2021-12-23 |
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT |
C. Portele |
all |
updates, based on SWG decisions on open issues; test suite added |
2022-03-24 |
1.0.0-draft.1 |
A. Youmans, C. Portele |
all |
include edits by Carl Reed and address comments; version for public comments |
Annex C: Bibliography
-
OpenAPI Initiative (OAI). OpenAPI Specification 3.0 [online]. 2020 [viewed 2020-03-16]. The latest patch version at the time of publication of this standard was 3.0.3, available at http://spec.openapis.org/oas/v3.0.3
-
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC). OGC APIs - Building Blocks for Location [online, viewed 2021-12-22]. Available at https://ogcapi.ogc.org/
-
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC). OGC® Routing Pilot ER [online, viewed 2021-12-22]. Available at https://docs.ogc.org/per/19-041r3.html
-
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC). WPS Routing API ER [online, viewed 2021-12-22]. Available at https://docs.ogc.org/per/19-040.html
-
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC). OGC Web API Guidelines [online, viewed 2021-12-22]. Available at https://github.com/opengeospatial/OGC-Web-API-Guidelines